×
WHAT: Lunch & Learn Webinar Series - a space where we explore practical topics to help us grow both professionally and personally.
This month’s session is titled: Say It Right: SBI Feedback Plus AI
WHEN: Thursday, August 21 at 2:00-2:30 PM PST

Join us for a 25-30 minute webinar where you’ll learn how to use the SBI (Situation-Behavior-Impact) model to give and receive better feedback and discover how AI tools like ChatGPT can help you practice and refine your approach.

This session is open to everyone, whether you're leading a team, working cross-functionally, or simply want to improve how you communicate. This session is for you.
Click here to register.

Managing Claims not on file

Solutions
  • Description

    Managing Claims not on file
   
 
   

Scenario Overview
A healthcare claims processor encounters a situation where a submitted claim is not on file. To resolve the issue, the processor must analyze critical details, verify patient eligibility, and confirm the submission process. The following case study examines the steps taken to address and resolve this situation.

Background
A healthcare provider submitted a claim for services rendered, but the payer’s system shows no record of the claim. The claim’s absence creates potential issues, including delays in reimbursement, possible resubmission requirements, and the need for verification of patient information.

Key Points to Analyze
To ensure resolution, the claims processor focuses on the following:

  • Verifying the claims mailing address or payer ID for accurate claim submission.
  • Confirming the fax number and determining whether faxing the claim is appropriate.
  • Assessing the enrollee’s eligibility status to confirm entitlement for the Date of Service (DOS).
  • Checking whether the member is listed in the payer’s system.
  • Determining the filing limit to ensure compliance with submission deadlines.
  • Reviewing the patient’s ID and group number for accuracy.

Process
The claims processor follows a structured approach, asking key questions to gather necessary information:

  1. Claims Mailing Address or Payer ID

    • "What is the claims mailing address or payer ID for this submission?"
    • This ensures the claim was directed to the correct destination.
  2. Fax Number and Submission Approval

    • "Could you provide the fax number, and should I proceed with faxing the claim?"
    • Faxing may expedite processing, provided it aligns with payer guidelines.
  3. Eligibility Verification

    • "Should I check the patient’s eligibility status to confirm entitlement for the DOS?"
    • Verifying eligibility ensures the patient was covered on the service date.
  4. Member Availability in System

    • "Can I confirm with the payer whether the member is listed or available?"
    • This step identifies whether the issue lies with the payer’s system or patient enrollment.
  5. Filing Period

    • "What is the filing limit for this claim?"
    • Understanding the filing limit ensures timely action to avoid claim denial due to late submission.

Resolution
By addressing these questions systematically, the processor identifies errors, confirms patient information, and ensures resubmission aligns with payer requirements. This approach minimizes delays and improves claim processing accuracy.

Reflection
This case underscores the importance of thorough analysis, clear communication, and adherence to payer policies when resolving issues with claims not on file. It highlights the critical role of effective problem-solving and proactive follow-up in healthcare claims management.